spectators: two.
The first point as she has always focused on the communications of the Mayor (there were) and ' approval of the minutes of the previous sessions which were approved unanimously as was finally the transcription of interventions.
The second point was related to quotas measures to reduce concentration of PM10 in the air and environment. Program agreement with the Marche Region, the Province of Ancona and the towns identified as belonging to Zone A of the resolution of the Regional Administrative No 52, May 8, 2007.
On this point, we have abstained because despite being in favor of any measure in favor of air quality and the environment, the agreement under consideration we felt it was no real effect since its is due to expire March 31 next and by then we will most likely not have been able to do anything, not even to put provided the signs ...
We voted on ' adopting the new regulation of the City Council of the boys which amended the existing one.
We also proposed an amendment (accepted) megliuo to specify the mode of election of minority representatives.
Then there was a communication to the Council of withdrawals from the reserve fund made with a Council resolution which is not yet reported to be involved.
The fifth point concerned the c ince of the evaluation in a partnership with the Municipality of Ancona and the Municipality of Camerata Picena.
On this point, we voted for, as well as being favorable to partnerships between municipalities, so that the impartiality of decisions.
Instead, we voted against the program of cooperation for the year 2011 as the contents of the resolution, in our opinion, does not satisfy the requirements that should have what is called the "program" simply to make predictions about the maximum "if any" needs of the organization.
The seventh paragraph relating to ' approval of an alternative to the technical standards for implementing the Master Plan on the implementation of non-residential areas (such as balconies and porches) we abstained.
Instead, we voted on the amendment art. 9 of the convention scheme, approved by resolution of the City Council No 68 of 08/11/2010 on the development plan sub-area C1 IP5 Setting as this amendment provides for the lottizzante required to establish the utility of the buildings to create the network of district heating plant bio mass, where this is ready.
Finally, we abstained on PRG variant on the integration of the provincial road network. In fact, this variant provides an alternative route to Via De Gasperi to avoid crossing the country by all non-residential traffic, and this is more than acceptable, but the new route will proprio a fianco dell'area destinata a nuovo polo scolastico , e questo, secondo noi, è un fattore di criticità.
The first point as she has always focused on the communications of the Mayor (there were) and ' approval of the minutes of the previous sessions which were approved unanimously as was finally the transcription of interventions.
The second point was related to quotas measures to reduce concentration of PM10 in the air and environment. Program agreement with the Marche Region, the Province of Ancona and the towns identified as belonging to Zone A of the resolution of the Regional Administrative No 52, May 8, 2007.
On this point, we have abstained because despite being in favor of any measure in favor of air quality and the environment, the agreement under consideration we felt it was no real effect since its is due to expire March 31 next and by then we will most likely not have been able to do anything, not even to put provided the signs ...
We voted on ' adopting the new regulation of the City Council of the boys which amended the existing one.
We also proposed an amendment (accepted) megliuo to specify the mode of election of minority representatives.
Then there was a communication to the Council of withdrawals from the reserve fund made with a Council resolution which is not yet reported to be involved.
The fifth point concerned the c ince of the evaluation in a partnership with the Municipality of Ancona and the Municipality of Camerata Picena.
On this point, we voted for, as well as being favorable to partnerships between municipalities, so that the impartiality of decisions.
Instead, we voted against the program of cooperation for the year 2011 as the contents of the resolution, in our opinion, does not satisfy the requirements that should have what is called the "program" simply to make predictions about the maximum "if any" needs of the organization.
The seventh paragraph relating to ' approval of an alternative to the technical standards for implementing the Master Plan on the implementation of non-residential areas (such as balconies and porches) we abstained.
Instead, we voted on the amendment art. 9 of the convention scheme, approved by resolution of the City Council No 68 of 08/11/2010 on the development plan sub-area C1 IP5 Setting as this amendment provides for the lottizzante required to establish the utility of the buildings to create the network of district heating plant bio mass, where this is ready.
Finally, we abstained on PRG variant on the integration of the provincial road network. In fact, this variant provides an alternative route to Via De Gasperi to avoid crossing the country by all non-residential traffic, and this is more than acceptable, but the new route will proprio a fianco dell'area destinata a nuovo polo scolastico , e questo, secondo noi, è un fattore di criticità.
0 comments:
Post a Comment